The majority of our websites are built on one of these two Content Management Systems. They're both brilliant, and they're very different to each other. A bit like parents with two kids who are vastly different, we have no favourite: each one brings a different set of solutions to specific problems. How do you decide which one is best for your project?
-
Umbraco
Great for larger projects when lots of customisation is needed and you want to connect some gnarly third party systems for additional information, commerce or bookings/reservations. Umbraco can handle anything you throw at it, and some.
Pros
- Uses Terabyte’s Design Language System to ensure leading-edge design, coupled with rapid deployment
- Big and fast - can easily handle high traffic volumes and demanding technical requirements
- Ideal for complex integrations
- Widely used: over 400K installs globally
- Open source, no license fees
- Regular feature and performance enhancements
- Excellent content editing experience
- More secure
- Easier to update / multipurpose images and content
Cons
- More time and effort required than WordPress to roll out standard/common functionality
- Relatively small plugin library to extend core features (requires custom build)
-
WordPress
Great for smaller projects or campaign sites which are light on functionality but need to look great. Template driven and open source means costs are relatively low.
Pros
- Extremely fast to deploy; standard/common functionality availability out of the bag
- Easy to use and easy to customise
- Mobile friendly
- Used by 59.5% of all the websites that use a content management system (CMS) –28% of the web uses WordPress
- Feature extension through a massive plugin library (over 45K available) making adding functionality fast and cheap
- Open source
- SEO friendly
Cons
- Cost of ownership can be high for very complex
sites
- Not as robust as Umbraco for integration with 3rd parties
- The more of the larger feature plugins you use, the slower your site can be